Contents
In this note
Part of
How the Netherlands thinks about military spending — and why it's changing fast
Part of: Dutch Economy, Dutch Politics
For most of the post-Cold War period, the Netherlands — like most Western European countries — steadily cut defence spending. The logic was straightforward: the Soviet Union was gone, the US provided the security umbrella, the money was better spent elsewhere. The Dutch armed forces shrank. Equipment aged. Recruitment suffered.
NATO (NAVO) had a 2% of GDP defence spending target. The Netherlands consistently missed it, hovering around 1.2–1.5%. Nobody was seriously punished for this.
Two things broke the consensus:
Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 made the threat of large-scale conventional war in Europe real again. The Dutch government announced it would reach the 2% target — and for the first time in decades, defence spending actually became a political priority rather than a line item to cut.
Donald Trump's return to the presidency in 2025 changed the dynamic further. Trump is openly contemptuous of European free-riding on American security. He demanded NATO allies spend 5% of GDP on defence — a number that would require a radical transformation of European military budgets.
At the NATO summit in The Hague in 2025, member states agreed to Trump's 5% demand. This was partly diplomatic management — give Trump something to claim as a win — and partly a real commitment. At 5% of GDP, Dutch defence spending would be larger than almost anything in the country's peacetime history.
What 5% actually means in practice, and over what timeline, is still being worked out. But the direction is clear.
Mark Rutte, as NATO Secretary-General since 2024, is the primary European face of this transformation. In May 2026 he convened major European defence companies — Rheinmetall, Airbus, Safran, MBDA, Saab, Leonardo — in Brussels, urging them to increase investment and production capacity immediately, without waiting for governments to place orders. The goal: show concrete results at the NATO summit in Ankara in July 2026.
His message is that European industrial capacity needs to rebuild fast, and that the companies need to take financial risk ahead of confirmed orders.
Defence spending increases enjoy broad cross-party support in the current environment — one of the rare areas of consensus. The debate is more about pace, procurement priorities, and whether Dutch industry benefits adequately.
The Netherlands has specific assets that NATO values: - Logistics and transport — Rotterdam port, Schiphol - Intelligence — AIVD and MIVD are respected services - Specific capabilities — F-35s, Patriot air defence systems, naval assets
What the Netherlands mostly lacks is mass — a large standing army. That's the gap the spending increase is meant to address.
Underlying all of this is a strategic anxiety: Europe is heavily dependent on the US for certain military capabilities, and Trump has made clear that dependence cannot be assumed permanent. The push for European defence industry expansion is partly about capability, partly about insurance against a future where American commitment is genuinely in doubt.
For the Netherlands specifically, this means decisions about domestic and European defence procurement — buying European where possible to build the continent's industrial base — are becoming more politically salient.
These guides are written to help you understand the Netherlands — not to replace professional advice. We do our best to be accurate but we make mistakes and information goes out of date. For anything that affects your legal status, taxes, finances, or health, verify with an official source or a qualified advisor.